Or git pull --rebase On Nov 26, 2014 2:04 PM, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <[email protected]> wrote:
> We should encourage people to use git fetch origin && git rebase > origin/master as means to catching up of others' work as opposed to just > git pull, but other than that its a great guide > > Yes Paul, this is basically what I do. Sometimes I cherry-pick tho and > close via a comment. > > -- > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > Freelance Developer & Consultant > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Paul Irwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Awesome, thanks Prescott! > > > > > > Paul Irwin > > Lead Software Engineer > > feature[23] > > > > Email: [email protected] > > Cell: 863-698-9294 > > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Prescott Nasser <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > I used this as my guide: > > > https://mahout.apache.org/developers/github.html (we should put this > in > > > our docs too :) ) > > > > > > > Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:42:04 -0500 > > > > Subject: Process for accepting PRs from GitHub > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > > I love PRs on GitHub because they are expressive, can contain > > > discussions, > > > > easy to see the status, etc. But what is the process for accepting a > PR > > > > from GitHub since the apache/lucene.net GitHub repo is a read-only > > > clone of > > > > the Apache git repo (or has that changed)? > > > > > > > > I can help with reviewing and accepting PRs as I'm a committer, but I > > > don't > > > > want to do things the wrong way. Itamar, are you checking out the PR > > > branch > > > > locally, merging into master, then pushing up to the apache git repo? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Paul Irwin > > > > Lead Software Engineer > > > > feature[23] > > > > > > > > Email: [email protected] > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294 > > > > > > > > >
