Itamar So, I suppose, I dont have to send ICLA now right ?? Regards Mohit Thakral
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <[email protected]> wrote: > C'mon, he deserves his own thread at least > > -- > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > Freelance Developer & Consultant > Lucene.NET committer and PMC member > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Prescott Nasser <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Er. Updated the Board - but > > Yeah, Please welcome Laimis as our newest committer as of Jan 5th I > > believe :) > > ~P > > > > > Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:43:03 +0200 > > > Subject: Re: Unecessary Paperwork > > > From: [email protected] > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > Thanks Rob. Not a lawyer, thankfully, but always good to have a > > > knowledgeable person around. > > > > > > We have actually voted Laimis in as a committer - being crazy busy > myself > > > so left Prescott the honor of announcing that :) > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > > > Lucene.NET committer and PMC member > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Rob Vesse <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Itamar > > > > > > > > I notice you have been asking everyone to sign an ICLA before you'll > > > > accept any pull requests which is actually unnecessary. ICLAs are > > only > > > > required for ASF committers (http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas) - > > > > > > > > "A signed CLA is required to be on file before an individual is given > > > > commit rights to an ASF project." > > > > > > > > The Apache License has a clause that explicitly covers contributions > > > > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0#contributions) so > anything > > > > submitted through the formal channels to the project is a valid > > > > contribution unless the contributor explicitly states otherwise. Of > > > > course a committer still has to merge and push the changes and the > buck > > > > stops with the committer in terms of ensuring the IP of the > > contribution > > > > is clean. > > > > > > > > Of course ICLAs are still desirable particularly when people are > making > > > > larger contributions but they should not block you from reviewing and > > > > accepting pull requests while you wait for one to be submitted > > > > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas): > > > > > > > > "The ASF desires that all contributors of ideas, code, or > > documentation to > > > > the Apache projects complete, sign, and submit (via postal mail, fax > or > > > > email) an Individual Contributor License Agreement > > > > <http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt>" > > > > > > > > The key word being "desires", unless someone has commit rights to the > > > > project they don't require an ICLA since the Apache License already > > covers > > > > their contributions. > > > > > > > > Btw if the PMC isn't already you should be thinking about offering > > some of > > > > these folks who have been contributing for a while now committer > > rights. > > > > Note that giving people committer rights does not prevent you from > > keeping > > > > the projects existing pull request, review then commit workflow. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Rob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
