Perhaps you should to talk with Sebastien Ros who is hired by Microsoft to do Orchard CMS
As I remember Orchard CMS uses Lucene .Net The current asp.net blogs are running on top of Orchard CMS 2015-02-05 18:23 GMT+01:00 Bogdan Litescu <[email protected]>: > Microsoft has own search engines to sell. > > We have a search engine built on top of Lucene for DNN. DNN is most popular > open source .NET CMS. It was actually a project started by Microsoft and > donated to the community more than 10 years ago. Same thing, Microsoft > didn't really invest anything in DNN since then. They have Sharepoint to > push to their clients. > > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I'm already in contact with them. Not as easy as you'd think... > > > > -- > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > > Lucene.NET committer and PMC member > > > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Frank Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I am sure that Microsoft would like to see Lucene.NET version running. > > > Maybe they can sponsor the effort. Just a thought. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Frank Yu > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Elad Margalit [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 6:34 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Lucene.net vs Lucene with IKVM > > > > > > Totally Agree with Syn-Hershko, > > > > > > Currently, I'm using the ikvm ported version, i can tell for sure, > there > > > is at least 20% penalty in performance. > > > > > > when you're using the ivkm version, the JIT avoid many optimizations, > in > > > the future, we'll be able to do much more optimizations - async/await, > > SIMD > > > instructions when RyuJIT is out in few month, bcl collections, > stackalloc > > > for small inline arrays and many other stuff. > > > we'll also be able to monitor the critical performance paths in tools > > such > > > as ants profiler or dotTrace, and make lucene even more faster. > > > > > > i have no doubt after the porting will be done, it will be about 15-20% > > > faster than the native java version. > > > > > > its a main goal for all of us to contribute to this port > > > > > > Thank you all guys > > > > > > Cheers, > > > E > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > It robs us of many optimization opportunities on the CLR. Java Lucene > > > > compiled using IKVM will not perform as well as a native port. Think > > > > async/await, BCL data structures, different GC considerations (LOH > for > > > > example), etc. There's also the issue of supporting PCL, Mono, Mobile > > > > and Azure natively. Just to name a few. > > > > > > > > I've had a chat with the lead developer of IKVM and promised to run > an > > > > IKVM version head to head with the native port once we are done. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant Lucene.NET committer and PMC member > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Omri Suissa < > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > It looks like it takes a lot of time to manually port Lucene to > .net > > > > (still > > > > > in version 3), why not using ikvm to port (at least as a base line > > > > > and improve from there)? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What are the disadvantages of ikvm in this case? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Omri > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > <http://www.dnnsharp.com/> > Bogdan Litescu > www.dnnsharp.com > www.facebook.com/DnnSharp > -- http://es.linkedin.com/in/albertoleontiscar/en https://twitter.com/AlbertCSharpMan http://stackoverflow.com/users/690958/alberto-leon
