Great, I will get going then. At the moment I am going through Analysis Core, trying to identify a very basic set of classes and their corresponding unit tests that I can modify to compile / pass. Itamar, at this point I don't mind if I step over something you already might have done, as this exercise will be useful for me to get familiar with the code in that project. I will keep an eye out in case you will push those changes you mentioned that you might have locally.
Laimis On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, that's great news! > > We are still in exactly the same place. A few failing tests in core, and > the analysis sub-project is the biggest blocker at this point from > releasing a beta version. > > I'm still around. I will happily look at PRs and provide ideas - I did > quite a bit of work in that area and may have some unpushed work locally. I > will check in a couple of days. I will be able to join active development > in a couple of weeks though. > > I like your idea for divide and conquer. You will find that the code in > that project is actually many small independent parts, with some central > pieces that are less trivial to port but need to be done right. > > JFYI, several teams in Microsoft (nuget and Orchard to name two) are > looking to use the new bits once we have something ready. I spoke to them > while I was at the MVP summit and they are interested in testing, helping > and looking at porting to CoreCLR once we've released. So it's great to see > you got some time in your hands again :) > > Itamar. > > -- > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > Freelance Developer & Consultant > Lucene.NET committer and PMC member > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Laimonas Simutis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello group, > > > > I am starting to get more time back and can contribute to Lucene.Net 4.8 > > migration again. > > > > Last I left off it sounded like the next big task was to get Analysis > > library ported over. I took a look at the Analysis code and I see that it > > is not fully converted to the point of compilation. And there are quite a > > few gray areas with Java constructs (SAX XML parsing, Collator usage) > that > > might not have .NET equivalents. Is anyone still around to bounce some > > ideas and do PR reviews? Itamar, are you still around? > > > > I converted Analysis unit tests and will be starting from that end: > include > > unit test classes one by one while including corresponding Analysis > classes > > required to run the tests, get the test working and then move on to the > > next test suite. Itamar, let me know what you think about that approach. > I > > will get going and see where this gets me. > > > > > > Laimis > > >
