I think making it an optional parameter sounds like a good idea on the surface. How does the java library handle this?
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:39 PM Itamar Syn-Hershko <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey folks, > > I'm working on some demos, and one things that keeps popping up and to be > frank gets quite annoying is the requirement to specify > LuceneVersion.LUCENE_48 on all public APIs - opening a readers and writers, > analyzers, etc. > > Since we only have one version release, and that concept is not going to be > really useful anyway, what do you say we remove (or set a default value for > it) on all public facing APIs? > > Cheers, > > -- > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > Freelance Developer & Consultant > Lucene.NET committer and PMC member >
