[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16121274#comment-16121274
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on LUCENENET-565:
------------------------------------------
Github user jeme commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/209
> Could there be Lucene.Net without Apache? I don't know. There must be
some reason why no developer before me went off on their own and decided to
pull it out from under Apache (and I don't think there is anything in the
licensing preventing it).
Actually way back the first time I began to look into Lucene on .NET I did
come across a few other attempts on just that, but I guess they died off in
favor for this, and to some extend thanks for that because one of them
attempted to use a RAW port (no .NET-fications) and then just build a wrapper
around it, in theory a good idea if you could do fully automated porting, but
in practice not viable at all I think...
Other solutions simply used a JNBridge and the Lucene Jar's... No idea how
well that would work, again I think you would have the wrapper layer. Sounds
awfully ineffective...
> Port Lucene.Net.Replicator
> --------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENENET-565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-565
> Project: Lucene.Net
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Lucene.Net.Replicator
> Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 4.8.0
> Reporter: Shad Storhaug
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: features
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
