I have no opposition to moving forward with 4.8 release personally, but I would 
like to just call out that while we (Microsoft Power BI) are using Lucene.Net 
4.8 beta5 in both shipping product and service production environments, we are 
using a fairly narrow slice of Lucene.Net functionality (just the core index 
with our own analyzers; none of the query parsers, document ranking or 
additional modules outside of the Lucene.Net assembly). So I wouldn't put all 
our confidence in the stability of 4.8 across the board on my team's usage.

If anyone else is currently using 4.8 for a more typical search scenario it 
would be nice to hear :)


-----Original Message-----
From: Andrey Kurdumov <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 9:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Update on dev happenings

I mean “use 4.8 beta” not “you 4.8 beta”. Was too excited to spellcheck, my 
apologizes On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:16 Andrey Kurdumov 
<[email protected]>
wrote:

> As an observer which you 4.8 beta on the project I excited to hear 
> this news On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 22:54 Elad Margalit 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Completely agree, the version should be released, done > perfect.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:42 PM Prescott Nasser 
>> <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Sounds pretty logical to me
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: Chris Moschini <[email protected]>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 5:12:57 PM
>> > To: [email protected]
>> > Subject: Re: Update on dev happenings
>> >
>> > Given the length of time since 4.8 became stable and the fact no 
>> > one is working on the ICU stuff, I think it would be best to move 
>> > forward with releasing 4.8 with a Known Issues addendum that 
>> > encourages others to contribute if they'd like things like a complete ICU.
>> >
>> > Lucene itself has advanced several major versions in the meantime, 
>> > to
>> 7.6,
>> > and catching up with them to reach better API parity seems like a 
>> > better use of any core dev resources than trying to perfect 
>> > something 3 major versions old.
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to