theolivenbaum commented on pull request #344: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/344#issuecomment-696558106
Hi @NightOwl888 , good point regarding the comments, will keep it in mind for future commits! One thing that comes to mind, what's the official goal reg. version parity with the Java Lucene source-code? Besides keeping binary compatibility with 4.8, is the goal to evolve exactly as in the original source-code / binary protocol, or is LuceneNet planning to diverge from it? Just to understand what kind of code changes could be introduced here :) ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
