paulirwin commented on code in PR #1129:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/1129#discussion_r1957372476


##########
src/Lucene.Net.Tests/Support/TestConcurrentSet.cs:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// Some tests adapted from Apache Harmony:
+// 
https://github.com/apache/harmony/blob/02970cb7227a335edd2c8457ebdde0195a735733/classlib/modules/concurrent/src/test/java/ConcurrentHashMapTest.java
+// 
https://github.com/apache/harmony/blob/02970cb7227a335edd2c8457ebdde0195a735733/classlib/modules/luni/src/test/api/common/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/java/util/CollectionsTest.java
+
+using Lucene.Net.Support;
+using System.Collections.Generic;
+
+namespace Lucene.Net
+{
+    /*
+     * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+     * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+     * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+     * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+     * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+     * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+     *
+     *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+     *
+     * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+     * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+     * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+     * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+     * limitations under the License.
+     */
+
+    /// <summary>
+    /// Tests for <see cref="ConcurrentSet{T}"/>.
+    /// </summary>
+    /// <remarks>
+    /// See the <see cref="TestConcurrentSetBase"/> class for most of the test 
cases.
+    /// This class specializes the tests for the <see 
cref="ConcurrentSet{T}"/> class.
+    /// </remarks>
+    public class TestConcurrentSet : TestConcurrentSetBase
+    {
+        protected override ISet<T> NewSet<T>()
+            => new ConcurrentSet<T>(new HashSet<T>());

Review Comment:
   Regarding my "(correctly)" comment above: I mean that it was correct to have 
to access the sync root twice in every method (once on entry and once on exit), 
but I changed this to access the field directly instead of the property, so 
that it avoids having to execute the getter each time. This should improve 
performance further, in cases where the property wouldn't be optimized away 
(i.e. via Dynamic PGO, possibly).



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucenenet.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to