On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Logan Bell <[email protected]> wrote: > [ ] +1 Release RC 2 as Apache Lucy version 0.3.1. > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 Do not release RC 2 as Apache Lucy version 0.3.1 because...
+1 * Sigs and sums look good. * The expanded tarball matches the tag. * Everything looks like it's there. * Builds and passes tests on OS X 10.6, Perl 5.12.2 * All other checks performed previously against 0.3 branch. Nice work, Logan! Marvin Humphrey gpg --verify apache-lucy-0.3.1.tar.gz.asc gpg: Signature made Fri May 4 14:14:00 2012 PDT using RSA key ID 84C1B5CB gpg: Good signature from "Logan Bell (CODE SIGNING KEY) <[email protected]>" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 978E 709C 1448 884E CDEA 7C20 36C8 710C 84C1 B5CB marvin@smokey:~/Desktop/lucy031 $ shasum --check apache-lucy-0.3.1.tar.gz.sha apache-lucy-0.3.1.tar.gz: OK marvin@smokey:~/Desktop/lucy031 $ cat apache-lucy-0.3.1.tar.gz.md5 1fabd3d3393a894d20226c445af9f6e4 apache-lucy-0.3.1.tar.gz marvin@smokey:~/Desktop/lucy031 $ gpg --print-md MD5 apache-lucy-0.3.1.tar.gz apache-lucy-0.3.1.tar.gz: 1F AB D3 D3 39 3A 89 4D 20 22 6C 44 5A F9 F6 E4
