On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Logan Bell <[email protected]> wrote:
> [ ] +1 Release RC 1 as Apache Lucy version 0.3.2.
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not release RC 1 as Apache Lucy version 0.3.2 because...
+1
Sigs and sums check out.
I diffed 0.3.2 against 0.3.1 and aside from the version number noise, there
are only small changes -- so all the licensing QC, etc. I did for earlier
0.3.x releases applies here.
No testing on Windows this time, but I built with g++ instead of cc, which
will often catch missing casts, C++ keywords, etc that would have tripped up
MSVC.
perl Build.PL --config cc=g++
./Build test
All tests passed.
Marvin Humphrey
marvin@smokey:~/Desktop/lucy032 $ gpg --verify apache-lucy-0.3.2.tar.gz.asc
gpg: Signature made Thu Jul 5 21:46:07 2012 PDT using RSA key ID 84C1B5CB
gpg: Good signature from "Logan Bell (CODE SIGNING KEY) <[email protected]>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 978E 709C 1448 884E CDEA 7C20 36C8 710C 84C1 B5CB
marvin@smokey:~/Desktop/lucy032 $ shasum --check apache-lucy-0.3.2.tar.gz.sha
apache-lucy-0.3.2.tar.gz: OK
marvin@smokey:~/Desktop/lucy032 $ cat apache-lucy-0.3.2.tar.gz.md5
45a6f09a5dd81d663b9f444cb5af22b2 apache-lucy-0.3.2.tar.gz
marvin@smokey:~/Desktop/lucy032 $ gpg --print-md MD5 apache-lucy-0.3.2.tar.gz
apache-lucy-0.3.2.tar.gz: 45 A6 F0 9A 5D D8 1D 66 3B 9F 44 4C B5 AF 22 B2
