: It looks like all the failure reports are from Chris Williams (BINGOS). Here : is another PASS on NetBSD:
Note it's not just that "all the (NetBSD) failure reports" are from BINGOS ... *all* the (known) failure reports for Lucy 0.3.2 are from BIGNOS -- a bunch on NetBSD, and one on "Debian GNU/kFreeBSD"... http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/9d442248-cb7d-11e1-b77e-25da5c0dd171 ...but BINGOS also submitted a success for "Debian GNU/kFreeBSD" (using a slightly newer perl)... http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/6446fb62-cafd-11e1-b77e-25da5c0dd171 ...my suggestion would be to pay close attention to the binary & ENV info at the bottom of the BINGOS failure reports, and compare them with other people who report success on the same OS/perl-V ... see if maybe he's got something special going on. Differences that jump out at me comparing these 5.16.0 reports (but may be red herrings, I know nothing baout Lucy internals)... http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/de289b76-cde0-11e1-8755-e63c2a028b78 http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/0cfdec42-d0bd-11e1-b77e-25da5c0dd171 - use64bitall - intsize, longsize, ptrsize, byteorder - longlongsize, longdblsize - ivsize - alignbytes - lgdbm - USE_64_BIT_ALL, USE_64_BIT_INT, -Hoss
