Marvin Humphrey wrote on 8/24/14 9:17 PM: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Peter Karman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -1 >> >> Sigs are ok, but I can't build because I don't have Clownfish or >> Clownfish::CFC >> available. Are we doing a separate release for that project now? > > Yup. We should make sure that Clownfish and Clownfish::CFC are on > CPAN before Lucy 0.4.0 is announced!
Marvin just pointed out to me on #lucy_dev that there is, in fact, a live VOTE thread on Apache Clownfish. Apparently that email never got to me, but I see it in the Apache list archives, so I know it's Just Me. Once I downloaded and installed the Clownfish libs, Lucy tested out just fine for me, so I can change this to a +1 vote on Lucy 0.4.0 RC2. I think the dependencies are documented clearly enough (and certainly the CPAN installer should figure them out); it's just that I didn't have the other VOTE thread to refer to for the artifacts. > >> I realize this is a chicken-and-egg situation, but I think we need to resolve >> that dependency issue, at least in the INSTALL documentation. > > Okeedoke. I'm afflicted by the curse of knowledge here, so the problem > didn't jump out at me -- thanks for pointing it out. The current > perl/INSTALL is confusing if Clownfish and Clownfish::CFC are not > available on CPAN. Will it be good enough once they are, or do you > see other issues? Yes, it will be good enough once they are on CPAN. > > PS: I've made an update to $LUCY/devel/bin/test_all.sh which should > make it possible to test Lucy from Git or a canonical Apache release > in one command (<http://s.apache.org/cmv>). That doesn't address the > documentation issue, but it lowers the cost of vetting release > candidates. I'll merge to master and 0.4 soon if I don't hear > objections. > Lovely. That will surely help. So in the end: +1 to Lucy 0.4.0 RC2 -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . [email protected]
