Nick Wellnhofer wrote on 8/27/14 5:57 AM: > Can't we just publish the Clownfish API with a disclaimer that it's subject to > change, and keep working on it at everyone's preferred pace? I don't see a > problem with that. But the last thing I want is to pressure you into putting > anything aside just to finish other language bindings as soon as possible. > This > doesn't sound like fun, and that's what it all should be about.
+1 Nick's points about the target audience for Clownfish and the rate of adoption are correct, IMO. Let's not make the perfect the enemy of the good. Nothing helps clarify the warts in an API like documenting it and getting people to use it based on the documentation. -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . [email protected]
