On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Marvin Humphrey <[email protected]> wrote:
> I suggest that the parcel dirs in "include" directories be required to follow > the naming convention "PARCEL-VERSION". That will make it possible to know > what parcels are available without having to parse every .cfp file. > > For "source" directories in contrast, any top-level dir could contain any one > arbitrary parcel. This suggestion is flawed as it would make it unwieldy to supply working project directories as "include" dirs. I have some ideas... let me think through them once I'm truly awake and resubmit. Marvin Humphrey
