+1 on the 1.13 release. It would be good to take the time for more feedback on 2.0 features / interface change since there won't be any backward compatibility.
Thanks, Rashmi On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Rahul Iyer <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 on doing a 1.13 release next. The 2.0 theme and features need to be > fleshed out further before doing a major version change. > The current theme for 1.13 looks good - looking forward to a productive > release in the next 2 months. > > Thanks, > iR > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Frank McQuillan <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thanks Ed for your offer to contribute. Are you interested in this JIRA: >> >> Support modern versions of gcc >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1025 >> ? >> Seems like a gap we should fill. >> >> >> Looking thru the 2.0 JIRAs, the emerging themes seem to be: performance >> improvements, more graph algorithms, misc feature improvements:. For e.g., >> >> [performance] >> Add mini-batching to IGD framework >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1048 >> >> >> [graph] >> HITS >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1124 >> >> graph cut >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1074 >> >> >> [feature impr] >> k-NN distance functions >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1059 >> >> Neural nets grouping >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1149 >> >> >> This seems reasonable to me, to have various different types of things >> coming into 1.13 rather than a single theme . The mini-batching is >> something I am excited about since it could help performance for a number >> of different modules that use gradient descent. >> >> But I'll wait till next week to get more comments from the community >> before making any version changes. >> >> Frank >> >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Ed Espino <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I like the idea of not rushing the Apache MADlib v2.0 and giving the new >>> interface time to sufficiently bake. Beyond the three items marked >>> resolved >>> for v2.0, do we have a sense of what the theme will be for MADlib v1.13? >>> >>> Current items targeted with v2.0: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MADLIB/versions/12333619 >>> >>> FYI: I'm looking for ways to contribute to v1.13! >>> >>> -=e >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Frank McQuillan <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > MADlib community, >>> > >>> > tl;dr >>> > >>> > Proposing we do a 1.13 release in Nov before Thanksgiving, and a 2.0 >>> after >>> > that around Jan. >>> > >>> > >>> > More >>> > >>> > The next release is currently numbered 2.0 as per current JIRAs, which >>> > includes interface changes >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1157 >>> > >>> > Because of the interface changes, the 2.0 release is not backward >>> > compatibility as per semantic versioning that Apache MADlib follows >>> > http://semver.org/ >>> > >>> > We have started a couple of wiki pages to discuss ideas for the new 2.0 >>> > interface: >>> > >>> > Ideas >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/Interface >>> +2.0+-+Ideas >>> > IO standardization >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/Interface+2.0+-+IO+ >>> > Standardization >>> > >>> > but it is not baked yet. So I am wondering if we ought to do a 1.13 >>> in Nov >>> > before Thanksgiving to give us more time to collectively make a plan >>> on the >>> > interface, which would go in 2.0 around Jan or so. >>> > >>> > Please let me know what you think, and also comment/add/subtract on >>> what’s >>> > proposed for the interface changes. >>> > >>> > Frank >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Ed Espino* >>> >> >> > -- Rashmi Raghu, Ph.D. Pivotal Data Science
