OK (Orhan Kislal),

Thanks for the info (Apache ID signature preferred). That will come in
handy for one of our future Apache HAWQ incubating releases.

Cheers,
-=e

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Orhan Kislal <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Ed,
>
> Thanks for the review. One of the comments from the previous release was a
> preference towards a signature with an Apache id. Since Satoshi-san is not
> an Apache committer yet, I took care of the signing process.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Orhan Kislal
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Ed Espino <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > A few MADlib v1.10-rc1 observations from a HAWQ incubator committer.
> >
> >    - The Copyright year (2016) in the NOTICE file needs to be updated to
> >    2017. I believe this can be handled in next release.
> >    - As it still applies, similar to a past comment by Roman ([VOTE]
> MADlib
> >    v1.9.1-rc2
> >    <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/981b4c24eaa2ab069b8e18f7aa4bdd
> > c7a78d3a9dc26bf659af94fcfe@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E>)
> >    - *"* name of the top level folder in the archive is weird. The usual
> >    practice is to call the top level folder as <project name>-<version
> > ID>*"*
> >     (example: *apache-madlib-src-1.10-incubating* instead of
> >    *incubator-madlib*)
> >    - I'm more curious than anything. Why did Orhan sign the release? I
> was
> >    expecting the release manager (Satoshi Nagayasu) to have signed the
> > release.
> >    - Checksums and PGP signature are good.
> >    -  ASF headers check: I spot checked files added (git whatchanged
> >    --diff-filter=A) since the last release. ASF headers look good.  Nice
> > Job!
> >
> > I was going to try and build but I ran past my allotted time limit for
> this
> > review. Hopefully, I can try this soon.
> >
> > Regards,
> > -=ed espino
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Orhan Kislal <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Orhan Kislal
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Joe Hellerstein <
> > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Sent from a telephone.
> > > >
> > > > > On Feb 16, 2017, at 9:17 AM, Frank McQuillan <
> [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Frank McQuillan
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu <
> [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hello MADlib community,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We have created a MADlib 1.10 RC-1, with the artifacts below up
> for
> > a
> > > > vote.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This will be the 4th release for Apache MADlib (incubating).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The main goals of this release are:
> > > > >> * new modules (single source shortest path for graph analytics,
> > encode
> > > > >> categorical variables, K-nearest neighbors)
> > > > >> * improvements to existing modules (add grouping support to
> elastic
> > > > >> net and PCA, add cross validation to elastic net, array input for
> > > > >> K-means, verbose output option for DT and RF, limit itemset size
> in
> > > > >> association rules, various madpack installer improvements)
> > > > >> * platform updates (PostgreSQL 9.6)
> > > > >> * bug fixes
> > > > >> * doc improvements
> > > > >>
> > > > >> For more information including release notes, please see:
> > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/MADlib+1.10
> > > > >>
> > > > >> *** Please download, review and vote by Sat Feb 18, 2017 @ 6pm PST
> > ***
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We're voting upon the source (tag):  rc/1.10.0-rc1
> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/tree/rc/1.10.0-rc1
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Source Files:
> > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/1.
> > > > >> 10.0-incubating-rc1/
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Commit to be voted upon:
> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/commit/
> > > > >> ea17530bfe22a1fde173d7fa83508cbcd9924c20
> > > > >>
> > > > >> KEYS file containing PGP Keys we use to sign the release:
> > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/KEYS
> > > > >>
> > > > >> To help in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > > > >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [ ] +1  approve
> > > > >> [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > > >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Satoshi Nagayasu <[email protected]>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Ed Espino*
> > *[email protected] <[email protected]>*
> >
>



-- 
*Ed Espino*
*[email protected] <[email protected]>*

Reply via email to