Ok, I suspected this was the case and had been running site:site

I'm also a little confused about what goes in the plugin configuration in
either build/plugins or build/pluginManagement vs what goes in the reports
section of the pom.

Also, was wondering if the execution for checkstyle and pmd that binds to
the validate phase was strictly necessary.

- Drew

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]>wrote:

> Never run 'mvn site'. It's documented to mess up on aggregate projects. You
> always want to run site:site site:deploy.
>
> If there are problems, you may need to mess with the dependencies of the
> site plugin.
>
> I hate the site plugin.
>
>
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Drew Farris <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Ok, I'm mystified, how are you generating the site? I still get the
> > following when running 'mvn site' from the root project using the latest
> > from trunk.
> >
> > [INFO]
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
> > [INFO]
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [INFO] An error has occurred in Checkstyle report generation.
> >
> > Embedded error: Failed during checkstyle execution
> > Could not find resource '/mahout-checkstyle.xml'.
> > [INFO]
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Robin Anil <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Works fine for me
> > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Drew Farris <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > See:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/a5da14bd5d1adceb/progress_with_eclipse
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Robin Anil <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > mvn eclipse:eclipse?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Drew Farris <
> [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, I think that probably broke the eclipse stuff tho.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to