Can anyone who worked on this code comment? They do seem minor. 428 would also be solved by moving to the standard Job superclass.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Peter M. Goldstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I submitted a few JIRA issues a couple of weeks ago and I was hoping to get > a committer to comment on and/or apply the submitted patches. Specifically, > the issues were: > > > > i) MAHOUT-428 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-428> - This should be a > pretty safe patch, considering it is patterned on another, already resolved, > bug. > > ii) MAHOUT-426 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-426> - This patch basically > adds some safety nets to the Mahout command script, ensuring that it doesn't > run the hadoop branch unless there's a Job file available. > > iii) MAHOUT-427 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-427> - This issue is a > question about the "-core" argument to the Mahout command script. I > couldn't find this documented on the wiki, and was hoping someone could shed > some light. Any clarification would be appreciated. > > > > I'd especially like to get 428 into trunk, so I don't have to maintain a > patched version on my EC2 image. > > > > Any comments would be appreciated. > > > Thanks. > > > > --Peter > >
