I guess the main thing I'd want to happen in combining EVJ and DLS is to make sure that the final output (changing the semantics of the CLI param is ok) is clear, with it either being the output of EVJ (if that is used), or DLS (if EVJ is not used). If that can be done, go for it!
-jake On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Jeff Eastman <[email protected]>wrote: > Jake, I see you are on line. I'm inclined to push forward on this despite > the adjustments to DLS --output semantics. Agreed? > > > On 9/13/10 10:34 AM, Jeff Eastman wrote: > >> r996599 completed the first part. Several additional arguments to EVJ.run >> need to be added to DLS (maxError, minEigenValue, inMemory, also the >> --cleansvn flag itself). Also DLS interprets --output as the >> outputEigenVectorPath and not as the generic output directory so DLS.run() >> will need another argument too. Still want to do this? >> >> On 9/12/10 2:19 PM, Jake Mannix wrote: >> >>> +1 on folding EigenVerificationJob into DistributedLanczosSolver. Or, at >>>> least implement a job() method on EVJ. >>>> >>>> +1 for having the latter, with a boolean flag in DLS to optionally call >>> EJV >>> after it's done. >>> >> >> >
