It's late in the day and I'm looking to make a quick fix ;)
On 29/09/10 18:49, Ted Dunning wrote:
Why ignore them? They seem to be pretty awesomely clustered!
One reasonable approach is to remove duplicate items before clustering.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Derek O'Callaghan<[email protected]
wrote:
I'm wondering if the quickest and easiest solution is to simply ignore such
clusters [with duplicate members], i.e. those that currently generate a NaN
std? I'm not sure if it's the "correct" approach though...
