This is, as they say, picking fly-specks out of the pepper. THere is no way you could even measure the difference.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jeff Eastman <[email protected]>wrote: > Even if the list is a couple hundred, the conversion time will be dwarfed > by the iterations. I'm +1 to disregard unless/until we can prove this to be > a bottleneck. > > > On 10/5/10 5:34 AM, Shannon Quinn wrote: > >> I only wonder because the algorithm is iterative, so even if the list of >> eigenvalues is short, the conversion will still happen every time the >> algorithm loops. But if this is small enough to disregard, that's totally >> fine. >> >> Apologies for the brevity, this was sent from my iPhone >> >> On Oct 5, 2010, at 3:22, Ted Dunning<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> That isn't such a big deal. Just a short loop. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Shannon Quinn<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Is >>>> there a way to solve this problem without my current "hack" of simply >>>> pasting each element in the list one-by-one into a Vector? >>>> >>>> >
