Cool. Go ahead, will commit soon after your patch is done.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > I have some small problems with the changes. > > I think that the same result can be had using inheritance more. For > instance, the based IDF text encoder should only over-ride the flush > method, > not duplicate the other methods. I have a tangle in my source code right > now, but I will try to put up a response patch > shortly. > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Robin Anil <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Take a look at the two patches. If they are worthy for this release. > > Otherwise I will commit them after the RC gets cut > > > > RObin > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > We should cut an RC branch soonest so that trunk commits can continue. > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > MAHOUT-287 and MAHOUT-521 are left for 0.4. We had talked about > > starting > > > > the > > > > release process from this morning. What's the ETA on wrapping these > up? > > > > > > > > I'd suggest we all try to start that process of review, polish, > testing > > > we > > > > had planned anyway and save any non-essential changes for the moment. > > > Cool? > > > > > > > > > >
