Hmm. It was there before, I think, but now you have me worried. I'll check.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Drew Farris <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Benson. I'm doing a build now. Before you start the respin, can > you verify that your src distributions include the conf directory at > the top level as well? > > Drew > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Drew, I've got the fix. I'm starting the release respin now. Please do >> an svn up to see what I did to the src assembly descriptor. >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Drew Farris <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Ok. I think I see the problem, the src.xml assembly should essentially >>> have the same xml stanzas for the conf and bin directories that the >>> bin.xml assembly does. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> I'm testing a fix that leaves it where it is now. Stand by. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Drew Farris <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think that we are agreed that it has to survive into the source >>>>>> distribution (and the binary distribution as well, of course). >>>>> >>>>> Yes, very much so. I'm looking at the assemblies now to figure out why >>>>> that's not happening. >>>>>I >>>> >>> >> >
