Actually, what it did was expose the fact that Mahout-566 needed an additional tweak. Committed that and happier with the results.
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > That is me and fair point, a note wouldn't hurt. Will do. > If that change broke anything you are welcome to undo it and find a better > way forward. The tests were passing at least. You'd know better what the > right change is. > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I am running through the fix for MAHOUT-556 and find that the JSON > removal > > process has also broken the trainlogistic/runlogistic examples. I will > > figure that out, probably by switching to a binary serialization. > > > > On a vaguely related note, I am seeing LOTS of commits lately that have a > > Mahout JIRA number (good so far) and no English. That makes it a royal > > pain > > to scan through the SVN or git history to figure out what has happened. > > Even five words of hint would be really helpful. (sean?) > > >
