[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005189#comment-13005189
 ] 

Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-622:
------------------------------------

Three cheers for this!

Excellent improvement.

> Mahout dependencies are unified under dependency management in parent pom
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAHOUT-622
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-622
>             Project: Mahout
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.4
>            Reporter: Dmitriy Lyubimov
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: build, maven, pom
>             Fix For: 0.5
>
>
> As far as I understand, Maven encourages "best practice" of unified view of 
> dependency versions specified under <dependencyManagement> usually in a 
> parent pom, instead of under <dependencies>. 
> In Mahout, this practice is only partially followed. Some dependencies have 
> concrete versions under <dependencies> tag in submodule poms. Proposed change 
> is to raid those and move version declarations into parent pom. 
> This (as far as i understand) achieves 2 things: 
> * Mahout assembly would include same versions for all modules thus ensuring 
> runtime module dependencies are the same as compile time;
> * Somebody who uses Mahout as a dependency, could import Mahout dependencies 
> using <scope>import</scope> spec thus inheriting Mahout's versions for shared 
> dependencies.  
> For most part the change would be nominal although in certain cases we'd need 
> to sort out through cross-module conflicts (if any). Commons-math was one, 
> not sure if there are more. If there are none, the changes would be rather 
> mechanistic. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to