A release happens at apache any time a committer offers to be release
manager.

There is no need for it to be a big deal.

With Mahout, the virtue of a release is that it decrease the number of
questions of the form "I used the latest release and couldn't find what you
are guys are talking about".  At least, it decreases the questions for a
time.

On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Lance Norskog <[email protected]> wrote:

> A major milepost is a "release" that people should use instead of trunk?
> Should Mahout push for that amount of fit&finish?
> Keep plowing ahead on new algorithms?
> Keep plowing ahead on tools to handle new problems?
>
> Lance
>
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Robin Anil <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe it's the first flush of springtime that's reinvigorated activity,
> but
> >> I do see significantly more activity in the last week or two. That's
> great.
> >> Especially since a lot of the activity is going into older issues too.
> The
> >> number of open issues is declining; it was over 70 a month or two ago
> and
> >> is
> >> now down to just over 50. That's a good trend.
> >>
> >> Our 0.4 release was Oct 31 2010. Given a general pattern of releasing
> every
> >> 6 months, that would suggest end of April for 0.5. I see no reason to
> rush,
> >> but reason to start asking those release questions:
> >>
> > +1, Faster releases matter a lot
> >
> >>
> >> - What do we want out of 0.5 as a release? I suggest it be viewed as
> nearly
> >> a release candidate for 1.0; the APIs and functionality should be
> >> substantially set by 0.5, to be polished for a 1.0 release in Q4.
> >>
> > Lets focus first on getting the progress we made since 0.4 out. Polishing
> > can continue in the summers
> >
> >
> >> - What is marked for 0.5 that just isn't realistically going to be done
> by
> >> anyone in a few weeks?
> >
> > - What isn't in JIRA for 0.5 that would be nice for 0.5?
> >
> >  Let me take a shot at scrubbing issues as well.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Lance Norskog
> [email protected]
>

Reply via email to