Grant, filed as MAHOUT-649. Let me know if you want to take it... thanks.

On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote:
> looks like some assertion there implies unix paths only, not
> platform-independent.
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Yes thanks Lance i know. the stack trace shows that some tests had
>> failures, the same .
>>
>> so need to dig into reports, had no time.
>>
>> i finally dug into surefire reports and for some reason it's not
>> cluster test dumper but some other test although it's not reported in
>> the console.
>>
>> org.apache.mahout.text.SequenceFilesFromMailArchivesTest.txt:Tests run: 1, 
>> Failu
>> res: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.144 sec <<< FAILURE!
>>
>> the report file
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Test set: org.apache.mahout.text.SequenceFilesFromMailArchivesTest
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.144
>> sec <<< FAILURE!
>> testMain(org.apache.mahout.text.SequenceFilesFromMailArchivesTest)
>> Time elapsed: 0.14 sec  <<< FAILURE!
>> org.junit.ComparisonFailure:
>> expected:<TEST[/subdir/mail-messages.gz/][email protected]> but
>> was:<TEST[\subdir\mail-messages.gz\][email protected]>
>>        at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:123)
>>        at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:145)
>>        at 
>> org.apache.mahout.text.SequenceFilesFromMailArchivesTest.testMain(SequenceFilesFromMailArchivesTest.java:112)
>>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>        at 
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>>        at 
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>>        at 
>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>>        at 
>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>>        at 
>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
>>        at 
>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>>        at 
>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>>        at 
>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
>>        at 
>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:76)
>>        at 
>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
>>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
>>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
>>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
>>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
>>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
>>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
>>        at 
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:59)
>>        at 
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:115)
>>        at 
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:102)
>>        at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:180)
>>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>        at 
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>>        at 
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>>        at 
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:350)
>>        at 
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:1021)
>>
>>
>> The bisect failed commit info does show this test as modified
>> $ git log --stat 86e6e1d64901 -1
>> commit 86e6e1d64901cc0ce436d43a56fcadb8a2cb6c1d
>> Author: Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]>
>> Date:   Fri Mar 25 14:39:25 2011 +0000
>>
>>    MAHOUT-588: partial commit, not including shell script yet
>>
>>    git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mahout/trunk@1085408 
>> 13f79535-4
>>
>>  .../text/MailArchivesClusteringAnalyzer.java       |  171 +++++++++++
>>  .../mahout/text/SequenceFilesFromMailArchives.java |  295 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  .../text/MailArchivesClusteringAnalyzerTest.java   |   61 ++++
>>  .../text/SequenceFilesFromMailArchivesTest.java    |  214 ++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 741 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> Grant, so it all adds up. Not sure why it is not going on my laptop,
>> it is windows 7,  java version
>> $ java -version
>> java version "1.6.0_22"
>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_22-b04)
>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 17.1-b03, mixed mode)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Lance Norskog <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Mvn -e shows errors, and --fast-fail means stop immediately. These
>>> might show the problem.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> i am not sure. it just says running the test and then after a while
>>>> bails out with 'build failed'. I looked breifly at surefire reports
>>>> but did not immediately see an error. which makes me think it some
>>>> sort of maven thing (which is why i asked about maven)
>>>>
>>>> Let me follow up on this.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> What's the error you are getting?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 29, 2011, at 11:28 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes I was perplexed as well as i couldnt immediately see a critical 
>>>>>> change
>>>>>> thhere but I confirmed manually that tests are passing before it and 
>>>>>> failing
>>>>>> thhere on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please don't worry. I highly suspect it is something specicfic to me. 
>>>>>> Just
>>>>>> thought you might have a quick guess.
>>>>>> One question though -- which maven version we are 'officially ' using for
>>>>>> this build?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> apologies for brevity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my android.
>>>>>> -Dmitriy
>>>>>> On Mar 29, 2011 8:19 AM, "Grant Ingersoll" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> What's the error you are getting? I don't have ready access to a Windows
>>>>>> box.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, I don't believe this commit touched TestClusterDumper.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Grant
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 28, 2011, at 11:45 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Grant,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> these are Bisect results, this commit broke TestClusterDumper in tests
>>>>>>>> on windows it seems.. My diagnostic might be wrong but that's what i
>>>>>>>> got.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 86e6e1d64901cc0ce436d43a56fcadb8a2cb6c1d is the first bad commit
>>>>>>>> commit 86e6e1d64901cc0ce436d43a56fcadb8a2cb6c1d
>>>>>>>> Author: Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Date: Fri Mar 25 14:39:25 2011 +0000
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> MAHOUT-588: partial commit, not including shell script yet
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> git-svn-id: 
>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mahout/trunk@108540813f79535-4
>>>>>>>> 7bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> :040000 040000 2b15021b60e0b772e2195948dddb1dd232a790d0
>>>>>> 9b163f5489ec03add7726590
>>>>>>>> 13b01c68d86cbaa3 M utils
>>>>>>>> bisect run success
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> doesn't pass on my windows laptop anymore.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am running a bisect now to figure where it started failing but it
>>>>>>>>> was ok at least 10 commits earlier. Any idea what commit broke it and
>>>>>>>>> why?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I guess I can commit with it being broken still but probably if it can
>>>>>>>>> be fixed it better be.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It also may be because my laptop is running windows (lame i know) but
>>>>>>>>> i'd rather had it fixed on windows too since previously all tests
>>>>>>>>> worked.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for any info.
>>>>>>>>> -Dmitriy
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --------------------------
>>>>>>> Grant Ingersoll
>>>>>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Search the Lucene ecosystem docs using Solr/Lucene:
>>>>>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------------
>>>>> Grant Ingersoll
>>>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> Search the Lucene ecosystem docs using Solr/Lucene:
>>>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lance Norskog
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to