I have not learned how to use the export/conversion tool for the CMS,
and I don't have time to take this on.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think 1) is just fine, personally, for these pages which are by nature
> quite static and infrequently changing anyway. It sounds easier. Do you or
> Robin have the mojo to make the files? I don't mind taking care of the rest.
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Is it...
>> > 1) Export all of those confluence pages to some reasonable HTML form
>> > 2) Commit and link to the HTML files
>> > 3) Delete wikis?
>> > If 1) is easy, then the whole thing is easy. We have a tool that makes
>> > 1)
>> > easy?
>>
>> Choice 1: preferred by Joe:
>>
>> Use a conversion tool to convert the confluence content to his
>> html+markdown format, check that into svn, delete confluence. Edit his
>> format ever afterwards.
>>
>> Choice 2: preferred by Dan and other aficionados of Confluence as a CMS:
>>
>> Install Dan's tool that runs every night and create a static HTML
>> version of the confluence content, sticking it into svn where the
>> infra tools know to pull it out.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Robin Anil <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Is this discussion on the infra list.
>> >>
>> >> sent from handheld device excuse typos
>> >> On Apr 7, 2011 8:51 PM, "Benson Margulies" <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > You should really read all of JoeS's writing on this topic, but, in
>> >> > short:
>> >> >
>> >> > Infrastructure draws a sharp distinction between 'the web site' and
>> >> > 'the wiki' for a project. They want 'the web site' to be published,
>> >> > via svn, as static HTML. No Confluence, no PHP, no nothing.
>> >> >
>> >> > To that end, Joe built a new CMS from scratch. Its uses markdown to
>> >> > ease the markup process, and it operates on files stored in svn.
>> >> > There
>> >> > are apparently javascript scriptlets to give you some level of
>> >> > convenience in editing in it. I haven't use it yet, myself.
>> >> >
>> >> > The original position of infra was that all use of confluence for
>> >> > 'the
>> >> > web site' would cease at Apache. Confluence would remain in use only
>> >> > for 'the wiki'.
>> >> >
>> >> > Dan Kulp of CXF and other projects really, really, didn't want to
>> >> > give
>> >> > up the convenience and expressive range of Confluence as a CMS for
>> >> > 'the web site'. So, he built a brand new static export tool for
>> >> > confluence that meets the stated requirements of the infrastructure
>> >> > team, and deployed it for CXF.
>> >> >
>> >> > Infrastructure will insist that Mahout achieve static publication
>> >> > *somehow*. The simplest thing we can do is adopt Dan's technology to
>> >> > render the confluence content into static HTML.
>> >
>> >
>
>

Reply via email to