File it! You are correct.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Lance Norskog <[email protected]> wrote: > Unfortunately that Mersenne Twister implementation ignores > setSeed(int). It should either implement it or throw > UnsupportedBlahBlahException. > > On 4/26/11, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > > Use RandomUtils.getRandom() > > > > Override MahoutTestCase in test cases so that you get a deterministically > > seeded test generator. > > > > RandomUtils.getRandom() returns a well-seeded Mersenne Twister for > > production use. > > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Jeff Eastman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> It's used in o.a.m.math.function.Functions.random() > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Jeff Eastman [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 2:14 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: RE: Question on Random number generators > >> > >> There's a MersenneTwister implementation in o.a.m.math.jet.random.engine > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 2:10 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: Question on Random number generators > >> > >> Yes. Let me find it. I thought that RandomUtils would have used that. > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Jake Mannix <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > We have a mersenne twister in here somewhere, don't we Ted? > >> > > >> > > > > > -- > Lance Norskog > [email protected] >
