There is a new version of Google Caliper coming that will be very interesting to watch. I temporarily froze JUnitBenchmarks waiting for the new Caliper and I think I'll switch the internals once it is out (because it makes little sense to duplicate measurement and reports infrastructure).
Dawid On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: > > On May 2, 2011, at 12:53 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > > > I'm aiming at microbenchmarks. No actually running on a cluster would > > be involved. The idea is to measure the speeds of things like encoding > > text vectors and matrix accesses and such. > > > > Yes, we need both. > > > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Oliver Fischer > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Do you know about this issue. I am currently working on this, but I > don't > >> know when I will finish. > >> > >> Provide a performance measurement framework for Mahout > >> => https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-670 > >> > >> Oliver > >> > >> > >> > >> Am 02.05.2011 12:42, schrieb Benson Margulies: > >>> > >>> Post 0.5, what do people think about populating some microbenchmarks? > >>> If we're going to consider dumping collections for fastutil, it might > >>> be good to have a measurement framework. I've had some success with > >>> japex. > >> > >> -- > >> Oliver B. Fischer, Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin > >> Certified ScrumMaster, OMG Certified Expert in BPM - Fundamental > >> Tel. +49 30 44793251, Mobil: +49 178 7903538 > >> Mail: [email protected] > >> Blog: http://logbuch.freiheitsgrade-se.de > >> > > >
