Hi, I took Grant's advice (Fernando, I would say just go ahead and put your patch up against core for now and we'll work this out. This discussion shouldn't derail you from putting up a reasonable first patch based on the current structure -- i.e. put the model where all the other impl. models are for now) and I submitted a patch on issue #705. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-705 Hope is all ok. Best regards,
Fernando Tapia Rico On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > Of course. I agree about JDBC. In practice, since JDBC APIs are a part of > core Java, not JavaEE, it doesn't really do any harm dependency-wise to > leave it in core. But it can move too indeed just for theoretical reasons. > > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > One person's core is another's non-core. ;-) > > > > I don't personally use JDBC much any more, so it isn't a "core" thing to > me > > and would be much more likely to use something like HBase/Cassandra/Mongo > > (perhaps even Solr/Lucene), etc. (The big difference, I suppose, is that > > Java has first order JDBC support, whereas it doesn't have first order > NoSQL > > support) > > > > >
