yeah, sorry. I commented out line 39: cd examples/bin On May 20, 2011, at 1:58 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
> It does seem these two symptoms are of the same problem. I applied the patch; > however, and now neither option runs. It appears the cd is off but I can't > see where. > > [dev@devbox mahout-distribution-0.5]$ time ./examples/bin/build-reuters.sh > Please select a number to choose the corresponding clustering algorithm > 1. kmeans clustering > 2. lda clustering > Enter your choice : 1 > ok. You chose 1 and we'll use kmeans Clustering > ./examples/bin/build-reuters.sh: line 54: ./bin/mahout: No such file or > directory > ./examples/bin/build-reuters.sh: line 64: ./bin/mahout: No such file or > directory > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 10:50 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Is LDA Broken? > > Likely so, see MAHOUT-694. > > > On May 20, 2011, at 1:39 PM, Sean Owen wrote: > >> Oh sorry these are the same issue? Great! >> On May 20, 2011 5:44 PM, "Jake Mannix" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Looks like Grant got a fix posted? Has anyone else tried it? >>> >>> -jake >>> >>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I think we definitely need to figure out whether it's a bug or some other >>>> confusion. If it's a doesn't-work-at-all bug yes probably the kind of >> thing >>>> that needs a fix ASAP in which case write up all you know and everyone >> will >>>> pile in to look at it. >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Jeff Eastman <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is this an issue that should be fixed before we release? It seems to be >>>>> broken to me. >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Jeff Eastman [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 5:05 PM >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Is LDA Broken? >>>>> >>>>> I'm running build-reuters option 2 and the LDA runs to maxIterations >> (20) >>>>> without ever producing a non-zero Log Likelihood. This is not the >>>> behavior >>>>> that I recall from earlier runs and seems quite unlikely to be correct. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> > > -------------------------------------------- Grant Ingersoll Join the LUCENE REVOLUTION Lucene & Solr User Conference May 25-26, San Francisco www.lucenerevolution.org
