Dhruv

Sorry I wrote your name wrong! I forgot to explain the classes:
KryoUtils is reads and writes Vectors and its features from a buffer of
bytes. I still don't know if there is an issue with
buffer limits.
The second class VectorSerializer is a CustomSerializer child that is called
whenever you try to read/write a Mahout Vector.

So that's it.

Best regards.
Gustavo

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Gustavo Enrique Salazar Torres <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Druv
>
> I have created issue MAHOUT-715 and attached 2 classes and POM
> dependencies.
> I hope it helps.
>
> Best regards
> Gustavo
>
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> No serialization framework that I know of does checksums as a matter of
>> course.
>>
>> All large scale computing frameworks that I know of do them.  The best
>> ones
>> do the checksum at the client file system layer before even sending
>> requests
>> to the server.
>>
>> Bit errors definitely exist, but I saw more errors on disk 10 years ago
>> than
>> have lately even with the dramatic increases in size.  The failure rate
>> for
>> drives is somewhat less, but still about the same but the transient error
>> rate is down dramatically on a per byte stored basis.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Lance Norskog <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Do any of these encapsulators do checksums?
>> >
>> > In light of the recent Google paper about rampant bit errors, and
>> > personal experience with high-end disk arrays, it is clear to me that
>> > that all stored data should have checksums. File systems, app-level
>> > encapsulations, the works. (TCP/IP has checksums, but they are quite
>> > weak.)
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Kryo is java specific.
>> > >
>> > > I would really like to use a portable solution.
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]
>> > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Seems to me like kyro and protostuff (not protobuff) are the big
>> winners
>> > in
>> > >> that one.  Avro's competitive on size, but not time.  Granted, one
>> > should
>> > >> never read too much into benchmarks, but...
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Lance Norskog
>> > [email protected]
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to