The summary of the reason is that this was a summer project and
parallelizing the random forest algorithm at all was a big enough project.

Writing a single pass on-line algorithm was considered a bit much for the
project size.  Figuring out how to make multiple passes through an input
split was similarly out of scope.

If you have a good alternative, this would be of substantial interest
because it could improve the currently limited scalability of the decision
forest code.

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Xiaobo Gu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Why can't a tree be built against a dataset resides on the disk as
> long as we can read it ?
>

Reply via email to