On Jul 18, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > I think the big win is to not construe this implementation to be based on > what is in the paper. I'm starting to think we should have two RowSimilarity > jobs. One for algebraic functions and one for those who are not.
And I don't mean two completely separate, just a different mapper/reducer for that phase (and likely a combiner, too). -Grant
