[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13091529#comment-13091529
]
Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-796:
------------------------------------
{quote}
So are you encouraging to proceed, benchmark, compare? get more info? do it
anyway? or drop it without comparisons?
{quote}
I will proceed with my latest family of computations without power iterations.
Along the way, I will look for ways to do them efficiently. It took me months
of looking at other things for the coin to drop on the fact that we don't have
to keep the Q around for the QR decompositions, however, so it may be a bit
before I figure out how to implement the power iteration really efficiently.
> Modified power iterations in existing SSVD code
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAHOUT-796
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-796
> Project: Mahout
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Math
> Affects Versions: 0.5
> Reporter: Dmitriy Lyubimov
> Assignee: Dmitriy Lyubimov
> Labels: SSVD
> Fix For: 0.6
>
>
> Nathan Halko contacted me and pointed out importance of availability of power
> iterations and their significant effect on accuracy of smaller eigenvalues
> and noise attenuation.
> Essentially, we would like to introduce yet another job parameter, q, that
> governs amount of optional power iterations. The suggestion how to modify the
> algorithm is outlined here :
> https://github.com/dlyubimov/ssvd-lsi/wiki/Power-iterations-scratchpad .
> Note that it is different from original power iterations formula in the paper
> in the sense that additional orthogonalization performed after each
> iteration. Nathan points out that that improves errors in smaller eigenvalues
> a lot (If i interpret it right).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
