Yeah but then our output is not interoperable with other stuff off the bat, over something pretty minor.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Lance Norskog <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah; it would have to be a variant of SequenceFile managed by some kind of > 'MahoutFileUtility' class. No, I haven't written it. "Tagged Sequence File" > with a suffix .tsq? > > A second use case crops up with the FPGrowth code. FPGrowth develops a > multi-level data structure of its results, then writes this out in a > SequenceFile. In the Mahout code base there is no code that reads this data > for any reason. It would be more useful to have different "flattenings" > written out in commonly used Writables. > >
