On Sep 1, 2011, at 2:47 PM, Sean Owen wrote:

> That's completely right. The use case is more for restarting a failed job
> rather than configuring the pipeline. You "really" want to do something
> different like piece together your own job.

yeah, this is the downside to our big monolithic drivers.  Oozie or others 
might be useful here.

> 
> This could be as complex as we want -- it could be its own project, defining
> a slightly-higher-level definition language for MR. In fact there are
> already one or two like that.

I was just thinking a registerJob to complement prepareJob might be useful and 
simple and hook into the AbstractJob/ CLI params

> 
> I like the idea... somehow I think you'll find it hard to implement across
> all the jobs since they're not even all in the same "format" at this point!

+1.  Standardizing this stuff is important.

> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Other than opening the code and looking, is there a way we register our
>> phases such that one could, via the command line, know what they are?  For
>> instance, I think, for now, I can skip, in my application, the first two
>> phases of the RecommenderJob, but it seems a bit awkward to say --startPhase
>> 2 given that at some point in a new release a new phase could be added in
>> and I would then have to go check the code.  Not the end of the world, but
>> it seems error prone and not readily maintainable.    I suppose as a bonus,
>> it would be nice if one could also know where each phase expects things to
>> be and in what format.  Would it make sense to have the equivalent of
>> prepareJob that does registerJob up front and can then be dumped out so that
>> one could see the phases and their inputs, etc?
>> 
>> -Grant
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------
>> Grant Ingersoll
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>> Lucene Eurocon 2011: http://www.lucene-eurocon.com
>> 
>> 

--------------------------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Lucene Eurocon 2011: http://www.lucene-eurocon.com

Reply via email to