Would need to iterate on non-zeros of the argument even, not on the receiver.
On 06.09.2011 17:24, Ted Dunning wrote: > Shouldn't AbstractVector specially detect the plus case and iterate only on > non-zeros? > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Jake Mannix <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Why not just override assign() in the sparse subclasses? >> >> On Sep 6, 2011 5:28 AM, "Sebastian Schelter" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The replacement of addTo() with .assign(..., Functions.PLUS) might cause >> havoc in sparse vectors with dimension Integer.MAX_VALUE as >> AbstractVector assign() will run from 0 to Integer.MAX_VALUE. >> >> Should we reintroduce it then? >> >> --sebastian >> >
