This is much less true when applied to map-reduce programs. The point of scalability is that the code, well, scales. As such, with a few caveats testing small is actually pretty similar to testing large. This isn't quite try when it comes to convergence rates and such, but basic function should still be there and can be confirmed without really huge scale testing.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Lance Norskog <[email protected]> wrote: > If it is supposed to run huge, then it has to be tested huge. The > current conversation not address this. >
