Sort of kind of, but it is hard to extrapolate over a size range of >10 and
that is the scale difference we are talking about.



On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com>wrote:

> and there's no way to estimate a difference  for a bigger sample?
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > This doesn't work because the correct value for a sub-sampled batch will
> be
> > smaller than for a full data set.
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> if it
> >> makes sense to find a better guess for lambda by just doing an R
> >> simulation on a randomly subsampled data before putting it into
> >> pipeline? or there's a fundamental problem with this approach?
> >>
>

Reply via email to