+1 and I'd love to see that patch. It begs the question: "Do we
have/need a criteria for removing the @Experimental designation?"
On 12/22/11 5:01 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
In my small test, these annotations did appear in the javadoc. The trick
is the @Documented meta-annotation.
I don't know what Retention and Target should mean. This was my beef with
Maturity as well. If there is a natural meaning that I am missing then it
would be fine.
Once we converge on an annotation scheme, I will produce and commit a
mega-patch that adds these annotations to lots of classes.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov (Commented) (JIRA)<
[email protected]> wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13175173#comment-13175173]
Dmitriy Lyubimov commented on MAHOUT-831:
-----------------------------------------
is it appearing in javadoc with the metadata? Looks good.
I would also add
{code}
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.CLASS)
@Target(ElementType.TYPE)
{code}
to indicate appropriate use.
@Experimental annotation to indicate which implementations are not
intended for production use
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: MAHOUT-831
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-831
Project: Mahout
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 0.6
Reporter: Sebastian Schelter
Assignee: Sebastian Schelter
Attachments: MAHOUT-831-2.patch, MAHOUT-831.patch,
MAHOUT-831.patch
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
