On Jan 13, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Josh Patterson wrote: > I agree with Ted here, 1.0 is more of a marketing thing than anything > imho. not a huge technical change.
That's why I thought we might want it in 0.6. Mahout 0.6, built on Hadoop 1.0 sounds better than Mahout 0.6 built on Hadoop 0.20.2903.57.19.10 or whatever it was ;-) But yeah, I'm fine with the approach outlined. -G > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> D has a good idea. >> >> 1.0 should be very nearly identical to what we have now so this isn't a big >> change, but it would be very nice to provide just a bit of consistency >> nevertheless. >> >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> No, haven't tried yet. >>> >>> i would release it with current dependencies and switch trunk to 1.0. >>> This way we will have time to work out new kinks, and people who want >>> previous release would use 0.6 and people who would like to try 1.0 >>> can use trunk. >>> >>> -d >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>> Should we be switching over to 1.0 for this release or wait? Has anyone >>> tried it out? >>>> >>>> -Grant >>> > > > > -- > Twitter: @jpatanooga > Solution Architect @ Cloudera > hadoop: http://www.cloudera.com -------------------------------------------- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com
