Ok i made edits suggested by Nathan. I don't think i see an error in
fold-in fold-out formulas though.

Anyone else wants to take a look before it goes on wiki and sends my
credibility out of the window?

https://github.com/dlyubimov/mahout-commits/blob/ssvd-docs/SSVD-CLI.pdf?raw=true

Thanks.

-d

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Nathan Halko <nat...@spotinfluence.com> wrote:
> Hi Dmitriy,
>
>  Just a few comments:
>
> --the computed factors are approximate  A \approx U\SigmaV^{T}
>
> -- the projection steps seemed transposed to me but they are consistent
> throughout ie.
> (2)  \tilde{u} = \tilde{c}_{r} V \Sigma^{-1}
>
> p. 3:  transpose \xi to emphasize row vector
>
> - 'mean of all rows' is a bit misleading, \xi entries are the mean of each
> column  (column-wise mean as you state below)
>
> - dimention -> dimension
>
> I haven't code dived into the new pca code to be familiar with it so the
> above comments are just picky notational stuff.  I did however, do some
> extensive analysis on the standard decomposition part (as of 0.6 SNAPSHOT)
> which can be found here
>
> http://amath.colorado.edu/faculty/martinss/Pubs/2012_halko_dissertation.pdf
> (starting page 139)
>
> Its a beast of a read so I can concisely discuss a few points perhaps on a
> different thread.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Could somebody please review SSVD command line usage doc before i
>> update it on wiki for inclusion of complete nonsense, in particular,
>> section $3 where it does overview of PCA and dimensionality reduction
>> techniques? Here's the SSVD CLI doc:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/dlyubimov/mahout-commits/blob/ssvd-docs/SSVD-CLI.pdf?raw=true
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>> -D
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > working on PCA section in SSVD usage .
>> >
>> > Just to confirm, if we run and svd over input with mean subtracted,
>> > then U matrix presents original data points converted to PCA space,
>> > right?
>> >
>> > thanks.
>> > -d
>>

Reply via email to