[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13244943#comment-13244943
 ] 

Saikat Kanjilal commented on MAHOUT-940:
----------------------------------------

So after researching this some more:
1) I don't see any class called ClusteredOutputProcessor so I assume you mean 
ClusteredOutputPostProcessor is that correct
2) In looking at ClusterDumper more closely I see two maps,one for the 
postProcessingClusteredDirectories and the other called writersForClusters, I 
will replace both of those with the APIs nested inside 
ClusteredOutputPostProcessor

Let me know if you see any concerns with the above approach.
                
> Clusterdumper - Get rid of map based implementation
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAHOUT-940
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-940
>             Project: Mahout
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Clustering
>    Affects Versions: 0.6
>            Reporter: Paritosh Ranjan
>            Assignee: Paritosh Ranjan
>             Fix For: 0.7
>
>
> Current implementation of ClusterDumper puts clusters and related vectors in 
> map. This generally results in OOM.
> Since ClusterOutputProcessor is availabale now. The ClusterDumper will at 
> first process the clusteredPoints, and then write down the clusters to a 
> local file. 
> The inability to properly read the clustering output due to ClusterDumper 
> facing OOM is seen too often in the mailing list. This improvement will fix 
> that problem.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to