Thanks Sean. Now I will send the announcements on dev and users list. ________________________________________ From: Sean Owen [[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 11:38 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mahout 0.7 : Release
I made you an administrator. I also Closed (and updated the markings on) the 67 resolved issues. It's a crude metric, but, the last release resolved about 120 items, and started 0.7 with about 40 open issues. There are 91 right now. This tells me again that there's a stronger mismatch between the amount and type of things people think should be done in the project, and what is being done. Again my suggested fix is -- you just have to close a lot of these as WontFix. On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Paritosh Ranjan <[email protected]> wrote: > I have committed the news items. > I will wait till someone with JIRA administrator right closes the 0.7 JIRA > issues. Once 0.7 issues are closed in JIRA, I will send the announcements > on dev and users list. > ________________________________________ > From: Paritosh Ranjan [[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 7:03 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Mahout 0.7 : Release > > Since I am not the JIRA administrator, I am not able to bulk close the 0.7 > issues. > Can someone with administrator privileges do it? > ________________________________________ > From: Paritosh Ranjan [[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 6:56 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Mahout 0.7 : Release > > This is all I have changed for the release news. Will commit it in a hour > or so. Please suggest if you think it can be improved. > > <h2 class="boxed">16 June 2012 - Apache Mahout 0.7 released</h2> > > <p>Apache Mahout has reached version 0.7. All developers are encouraged > to begin using version > 0.7. Highlights include:</p> > > <ul> > <li>Outlier removal capability in K-Means, Fuzzy K, Canopy and > Dirichlet Clustering</li> > <li>New Clustering implementation for K-Means, Fuzzy K, Canopy and > Dirichlet using Cluster Classifiers</li> > <li>Collections and Math api consolidated.</li> > <li>(Complementary) Naive Bayes refactored and cleaned.</li> > <li>Watchmaker and Old Naive Bayes dropped.</li> > <li>Many bug fixes, refactorings, and other small improvements</li> > </ul> > > <p>Changes in 0.7 are detailed in the <a href=" > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310751&version=12319261";>release > notes</a>.</p> > ________________________________________ > From: Grant Ingersoll [[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 11:18 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mahout 0.7 : Release > > Feel free to circulate a draft if you want some other people to look at it. > > Thanks for all your effort on being the RM! > > -Grant > > On Jun 15, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Paritosh Ranjan wrote: > > > Fixed it. Thank you. > > Now the only things left for release is to commit the news. I will > tonight (till 10-12 hrs from now) for more news points. > > After that, I will commit the news items. > > ________________________________________ > > From: Paritosh Ranjan [[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 6:16 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Mahout 0.7 : Release > > > > While trying to add my key to the KEYS file at > http://www.apache.org/dist/mahout/0.7/ > > I am getting the following error : gpg: error reading key: No public key. > > Can someone help? > > > > pranjan@minotaur:/www/www.apache.org/dist/mahout$ (gpg --list-sigs > 383BD997 && gpg --armor --export 383BD997) >> KEYS > > Warning: using insecure memory! > > gpg: error reading key: No public key > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: Grant Ingersoll [[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 3:41 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mahout 0.7 : Release > > > > I think we've cleaned up (C)NB quite a bit. > > > > We should probably also mention that we axed a fair amount of code > (watchmaker is dropped, old naive bayes) and that we consolidated > collections and math. > > > > On Jun 15, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Paritosh Ranjan wrote: > > > >> I have released the artifacts in nexus and copied the files at > http://www.apache.org/dist/mahout/0.7/. > >> > >> I need some help for the news items. > >> Till now we have gathered these : > >> > >> Outlier removal capability implemented in K-Means, Fuzzy K, Canopy and > Dirichlet Clustering. > >> New Clustering implementation for K-Means, Fuzzy K, Canopy and > Dirichlet using Cluster Classifiers. > >> Many small fixes and improvements. > >> > >> Would someone like to add more? > >> This is the link to 0.7 issues: > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+MAHOUT+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%220.7%22+AND+status+%3D+Resolved+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide > >> > >> ________________________________________ > >> From: Paritosh Ranjan [[email protected]] > >> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 7:49 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Mahout 0.7 : Release > >> > >> The voting has been open for three days. > >> There has been 4 + votes and 0 - votes for the release. > >> > >> So, I will release the artifact in the nexus repository now. > >> > >> @Grant > >> Yes, I will surely update the docs. I have few findings which I think > can help in making the explanation of release process better. > >> ________________________________________ > >> From: Grant Ingersoll [[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 2:29 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mahout 0.7 : Release > >> > >> +1. The sigs, etc. all check out and the examples run. > >> > >> Paritosh, now that you've done this a few times, please do update the > docs if you see anything that can be improved. > >> > >> On Jun 12, 2012, at 3:51 AM, Paritosh Ranjan wrote: > >> > >>> Mahout 0.7 - release candidate II is available on > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-227/. > >>> > >>> Please vote [+1, 0, -1 ] for its release. Based on the votes, the > artifact will be released ( or not ). > >>> The voting closes in 3 days from now. > >>> > >>> Paritosh > >>> ________________________________________ > >>> From: Paritosh Ranjan [[email protected]] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 7:55 AM > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Mahout 0.7 : Release > >>> > >>> The voting has been open for 3 days. > >>> We have received 2 negative votes and 1 positive vote. > >>> > >>> So, I will release it again. > >>> ________________________________________ > >>> From: Robin Anil [[email protected]] > >>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 11:31 PM > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mahout 0.7 : Release > >>> > >>> -1 There were really bad bugs. Please redo. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Jeff Eastman < > [email protected]>wrote: > >>> > >>>> -1 > >>>> > >>>> I believe recent commits r1348707 and 1349015 are serious and > important > >>>> enough to re-do the 0.7 RC > >>>> > >>>> Jeff > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 6/9/12 2:35 AM, Paritosh Ranjan wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> The release candidate for Mahout 0.7 is available on > >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/** > >>>>> orgapachemahout-216/< > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-216/> > >>>>> . > >>>>> > >>>>> Please vote [+1, 0, -1 ] for its release. Based on the votes, the > >>>>> artifact will be released ( or not ). > >>>>> > >>>>> The voting closes in 3 days from now. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >
