[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13468399#comment-13468399
]
Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-202:
----------------------------------
(It can't be reopened as it's closed, but, a new JIRA can be made.)
My concern here is that this could be very slow at scale. A local relational DB
is too slow when you get into, say, 100K data points or more. Local HBase may
not be much different. What kinds of performance did you see?
The counterpart implementations actually load into memory.
> Make Taste support HBase as data store
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAHOUT-202
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-202
> Project: Mahout
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Collaborative Filtering
> Affects Versions: 0.3
> Reporter: Jeff Zhang
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: MAHOUT-202.patch
>
>
> I'd like to add hbase as another data store option for taste.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
