You're right! We'll have the 1-on-1 as planned. Now, I need to get back to generating LLVM code... :)
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Dan Filimon <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi Ted, >> >> I have a lot of work to do for school (multiple assignments with >> pressing deadlines :) and I won't be able to do any meaningful work >> this week. > > > School comes first. > >> >> So, I'll mostly just be reading the papers (streaming k-means) again >> to correct any more misconceptions. I didn't really read the paper all >> that carefully so now would be a good time for that. > > > As you like. Or not. Focus where focus is needed. Defocus if you need > relaxation. > >> >> This is why I'm thinking we could skip this week's one on one. We >> could do it, but without me doing enough work I'd probably waste your >> time. > > > How about we have the one-on-one anyway but expect that it will take 5 > minutes? > > I would rather you planned on those five minutes than re-reading an article > that is a distraction away from school.
