Why would you say fastutil more than hppc? Currently all we use in Mahout is lists and hashmaps, and we don't even currently have proper iteration over the latter, so we certainly don't depend on Collections compatibility...
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Dawid Weiss <[email protected]>wrote: > > Indeed. We have considered switching in the past, but the momentum never > > developed. > > Exactly. Should somebody find the time to do the switch at some point > I'd say fastutil would be more appropriate for Mahout since it is > Collections-compatible and contains more different variants of common > data structures which may be handy in the future. > > Dawid > -- -jake
